Well, I started this reply last night, but was unable ot finish, due to some power problems in my neighborhood, so I'll see what I can do to finish it up . . .
first and foremost, I'm gonna ignore 92boostednotch, because I will just end up making fun of him too much, and he will take it way too personally, and try to start namecalling again.
I think 67king's post is prolly the best to respond to, as he covered things pretty well . . . (though, I think deep down, he and I are pretty well in agreement, right Harry?

)
Quote:All of that is perfectly fine and repeatable - in an isolated system.
Yes, but not just in an isolated system, there are other cases where it will be applicable that are not isolated.
Quote:Guess what, fellas, we don't have an isolated system.
No we don't, but we do have a system that can be legitimately treated as a constant flow system, and things still apply (check a basic fluid mechanics textbook, c'mon, I know you saved yours)
Quote:THe fact that air is constantly moving in and out of the system means that a pressure drop will be caused by anything impeding flow.
Absolutely, positively 100% correct. Though, I might phrase it "The fact that air is moving at all, means anything impeding flow will cause a loss of flow energy, or, a pressure drop". Further, in a practical situation, most of the pressure losses encountered will be due to flow "friction" we are talking about here.
Quote:And the fact that the intercooler does not seal the two sides from each other means that they would be at the same pressure if there were no airflow.
Also true, but airflow at a given mass flow rate, and with everything else constant, except temperature, the pressure must drop with the temperature.
Anyway, I won't bother finishing that train of thought, because bluovalguy has done a good job covering it.
Cozz,
Yes, that statement is true, while in your application there may be other affects involved that may cloud seeing it clearly. Please, go take a basic thermo, or fluid mechanics class, and then come back if you still disagree. Its a simple matter of physics, that lowering the temperature of a given mass of air, while keeping it in the same volume (ie pipe size) the pressure must decrease by an amount directly proportional to the temp decrease.
and back to the original question, I also agree w/ 67king and bluovalguy on thier assesments, however, I would be far less willing to depend on a water/alky injection system on the street for detonation control, mostly because the complexity necessary when you make the system "fail-safe", and the inherently lower reliability of that far more complex system.